current info

An old Cherokee is teaching his grandson about life. "A fight is going on inside me," he said to the boy.


"It is a terrible fight and it is between two wolves. One is evil—he is anger, envy, sorrow, regret, greed, arrogance, self-pity, guilt, resentment, inferiority, lies, false pride, superiority, and ego." He continued, "The other is good—he is joy, peace, love, hope, serenity, humility, kindness, benevolence, empathy, generosity, truth, compassion, and faith. The same fight is going on inside you—and inside every other person, too."

The grandson thought about it for a minute and then asked his grandfather, "Which wolf will win?"

The old Cherokee simply replied, "The one you feed."

First People - The Legends. Cherokee Legend of Two Wolves. November 16, 2004. [accessed April 7, 2012].
Showing posts with label Prince George's County. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Prince George's County. Show all posts

Saturday, July 12, 2014

The "Battle" Raid on Beltsville - July 12, 1864

Published in the Prince George's County Historical Society Newsletter - News & Notes.

Founded in 1952, this all-volunteer, non-profit organization works to fulfill its mission of preserving and promoting the County's long and diverse history through: Reproducing new and out-of-print historical materials; Collecting records, documents, photographs, and artifacts reflecting the County's social, economic and political history; Operating the Frederick S. DeMarr Library of County History; Providing educational opportunities through lectures, programs and tours; Recognizing and supporting individuals and organizations that are making significant contributions to the preservation of the County's rich multi-ethnic, multi-cultural heritage.

There are many benefits to becoming a member of the Prince George's County Historical including a subscription to News and Notes, published by the Society. to join: http://www.pghistory.org/join-us.php?st=Join-Us


The Raid on Beltsville July 12th, 1864

            150 summers ago in Prince George's  County, on July 12th, 1864, Confederate soldiers rode into Beltsville, Maryland, tore up the rail-line and burned railcars of the B&O railroad before returning to Virginia. Commanded by Maryland-born Brigadier-General Bradley Johnson, the rebel cavalry was operating on the left of Jubal Early's invading Confederate Second Corps' attack on Washington, D. C. 

            The raid and resultant skirmishes between Federal and Confederate cavalry units took place between today's Beltsville and College Park. The military actions moved on a north-south axis west of the CSX railroad line, then operated by the B&O, and were centered along US Route 1 formerly called the Baltimore-Washington Pike. To the west of the turnpike was the Paint branch, a stream that head south east through Maryland on its way to join the eastern branch of the Potomac river, the Anacostia. To the west of the pike, along the Paint branch, named for the red and blue clay that lines its course, big trees grew close together on the bank; low woodland stretched far back from the stream presenting a scenic wild aspect to the landscape (The Rambler. Sunday Star. November 1916). 
         
            Most of the buildings mentioned in reports of the day are long gone including the home of Major. Geo. M. Emack, CSA (now a shopping center across US 1 from St. John's Church), Brown's White House Tavern (now a shopping center immediately south of USDA BARC), the rail depot or station in Beltsville; Dr. Montgomery Johns' house on Knox Ave. in College Park; and Mrs. McDaniel's house which served as a headquarters for federal operations in front of Fort Lincoln in Bladensburg, Maryland.

            The Official Record of the Civil War, Series I, Vol. XXXVII, provides a running account of the day's events which reflects the confusion of the moment that translates into uncertainty of describing exactly what happened when and where to readers today.  At 7:50 a.m., Major-General Gillmore, USA, set up his "command near the old Bladensburg road" to coordinate Union defense from Fort Lincoln to Fort Bunker Hill.  Two hours later, Major Fry, the provost-general, sent word that "the enemy's cavalry is trying to turn our right."

            The Daily Constitutional Union, (2nd Edition July 12, 1864), reported that "enemy appears to have reached the line of the Washington branch railroad between 12 and 1 o'clock, today, shortly after the last train from Baltimore had passed to the city. The train which left Baltimore at 10 a.m., came through to within about 1 mile of Beltsville, when a number of men at work on the second track of the road came running towards it, giving the alarm that rebel cavalry, in some force had just been approaching towards Beltsville. After delay a 15 minutes, however, by sending ahead, information was received that it was our own cavalry else that had been seen, and the train again came on, and arrived here quarter of an hour behind time. By 1 o'clock, it was found that the telegraph wires were down between this city and Baltimore, which would seem to confirm the idea that the alarm at Beltsville was not entirely groundless."

            By 1:30 p.m., Capt. Paddock, Post Commander Battery Jameson, Fort Lincoln, was informing Secretary of War Stanton that "a farmer just arrived bringing intelligence from the commanding officer of the outside pickets that the enemy was [sic] approaching in force in this direction. They are now about two miles this side of Beltsville, which is five miles northeast of here." At 2:00 p.p.,, from Mrs. McDaniel's house, Major Barney, [USA], "of Washington City, just from the front", [brought] a report from the officer commanding the cavalry [5th Michigan Cavalry] on the Baltimore pike that he had been driven in, and that the enemy are in force two miles this side of Beltsville making for railroad." [1]   

            A newspaper account 52 years later described the coming of the Union forces to the Brown farm to water and feed their horse. As the Federal soldiers commandeered supplies, the widowed Mrs. Brown saw a dust cloud and a large large numbers of horsemen approaching, and called for the Union commander to come upstairs and see for himself. He rounded up his troops and shot his way across the Paint branch to safety before the Confederate forces could surround him. One Union cavalryman was wounded when Major Emack's 1st Maryland, CSA, cavalry company charged the hurriedly regrouping Federal cavalry. The wounded soldier was sent to Major Emack's home across from the Episcopal Church, St. John's, less than two mile up the road. (The Rambler. Sunday Star, November 1916).[2]

Emack House - Locust Grove
image courtesy - DeMarr Library Historian
Prince George's County Historical Society


            In a telegraphed message to General Grant from Under Secretary of War, Charles A. Dana, the defense of Washington was described as consisting of many generals none of whom were in command. In this vein of multiple commanders, at 2:15, General Meigs was reporting from Fort Slocum that "500 cavalry, under Major Fry, was attacked four miles beyond Bladensburg, toward Baltimore, by the enemy in force, with artillery. He [Major Fry] is falling back toward Bladensburg, at which place ... he will need rations and forage, and also carbine and pistol ammunition, for 100 men who reported to him last evening unsupplied." The 17th Pennsylvania Cavalry, USA, sent word to Captain Paddock at Fort Lincoln that " a scouting party just returned report[ing] that they met a force of the enemy's cavalry with artillery about three miles above this place toward Beltsville."

            By 3:00 p.m.,, Secretary Stanton was receiving information from the peripatetic B&O ticket agent, G. S. Koonz, who explained how the railroad company's " ballast engine has just come in from Beltsville. Trainmen report that rebels in force were in sight when they left. Our forces ready to receive them. Rebels fired at engine, but it was out of range. Beltsville is twelve miles distant from Washington and is a station on our road." Twenty minutes later, the Secretary of War was updated by Major Fry of the situation at Fort Lincoln and points north:

"A force of rebel cavalry has within the last few hours been engaged with about 300 of our cavalry, at the Baltimore pike where it crosses Paint Creek, about three miles beyond Bladensburg. The rebel force was accompanied by light artillery, which up to the time my informant left had fired about fifteen shots. My informant is one of our cavalry, just in, who was wounded in the skirmish. Our 300 cavalry were yielding their ground slowly. I should say it was an attempt to interrupt the railroad by a cavalry force. The skirmish is about two miles west of railroad. The line of rifle-pits from this fort westward is entirely unmanned. There is not a soldier on the line as far as I can see it, and but two companies of 100-days' men and a few convalescents in this fort. The pike is really open to a cavalry dash. I think troops should come to this part of the line is now seriously threatened. I have not seen General Gillmore. Perhaps he has made disposition. The line now is certainly weak in the extreme. I will go from here to Fort Saratoga, and try to see General Gillmore; but I suggest action from headquarters to strengthen this line at once. The convalescents here are not armed. Muskets and Ammunition should be sent at once."

At 4:05 p.m., General Gillmore wrote:

"The enemy are [sic] just beyond Bladensburg. Fugitive citizens are coming in. I have carefully examined the line of works from Fort Bunker hill to Fort Lincoln. More troops should be on this part of the line. I saw eight brass field pieces in Fort Lincoln not in use. They ought to be put in position, I think, with men to man them. I am not in command of the line in my front by any orders from you or any one else." During the afternoon of the 12th, US Navy Admiral Goldsborough had been order to gather up office works and man the defensive works of Fort Lincoln in response to the perceived threat from Johnson's cavalry now apparently moving towards Bladensburg."

            At some point in the afternoon, Dr. Montgomery Johns recounted the passing of the rebel units through what is now the University of Maryland campus. Johns, a Professor at the Agricultural College, later explained, in defense of his actions that day, that "the rebel stopped on the Turnpike in front of Rossburg (presently called the Rossborough Inn) 10 minutes, then proceeding toward Bladensburg, where met by (Union) skirmishers at 'Kenedy's Hill' and turned westward through the campus. Some of the Confederates stopped at the Johns' home and demanded food. Johns was taken to see the leader, Gen. Johnson, 'a distant Kinsman'. Altogether the troops, stated to 500 in number, were on the campus "about 45 minutes. (Pri. Geo.'s Historical Society News & Notes, April 1974)'" During the foray, the Confederates burned the bridge over the Paint branch just north of the present entrance to the University of Maryland, College Park.

            By 8:45 p.m., Mr. Koonz was again relaying information to Stanton. His account this time noted that he had been "as far as Bladensburg. Enemy has not shown himself between Washington and that point. At Bladensburg I was met by a Mr. Bowie, who seems to be acting as an aide. He advised me to proceed no farther, as enemy was [sic] about one mile and a half above. He estimates their force at about 1,500 cavalry and one battery of artillery. Our bridges across Paint Branch, two miles above Bladensburg, have been destroyed."

            The last of the rebel cavalry left the area mid morning on July 13th. The next day the President of the B&O railroad sent a message to Stanton noting that a "hand-car with some of our men, and an engine and car in charge of our agent at Washington, Mr. Koontz, have arrived in Baltimore within the last hour, communicating the information that the road is now clear of the enemy, and that the burning has been confined to twelve camp and other cars of the company, and the partial destruction of the cross-ties of one bridge."   On July 14th that the damage done to the railroad in Beltsville did not amount to more than three cross-ties burned and some lumber placed across the tracks.

            The Johnson-Gilmore raid ended in Beltsville. Some after-action reports indicate that some of the Confederate force had begun to head towards Upper Marlboro as part of the larger plan to free Confederate prisoners in St, Mary's County. The skirmish at Beltsville ended a rebel swing through Maryland that had taken Johnson's command from Frederick east to Baltimore. Led by the 1st Maryland Cavalry, CSA, they had burned bridges and obstructed rail-lines north of Baltimore, and had found time to burn the home of Maryland's Governor, Augustus Bradford. As they continued through central Maryland, the government of Maryland and the US military played a telegraphed guessing game as to the intent and goal of the fast-moving southern cavalry. The raid through Maryland was a part of a larger Confederate operation that planned to attack the Capital of the United States, Washington, D.C. The resulting battle fought along the Monocacy river slowed the invading army down long enough for the US Army to execute a defense of the city. The delayed assault of Early's Army on Fort Stephens (in Silver Spring near Georgia Avenue) failed on July 12th, and Early order Johnson's command to rejoin the 2nd Corps as it began its retreat to Virginia and the end of the rebellion 10 months later. Although we have let the buildings decay and disappear, the people and their fight continue to shape our landscapes today.                    




[1] Newspapers report that the Confederate forces, probably the 1st Maryland, engaged Major Belmont in command of a detachment of the 5th Michigan Cavalry. The Official Record includes mentions and reports of Major Darling and the 7th Michigan with no mention of his being driven back.
[2] The topography of the land along US Route 1 is such that the Emack House, Locust Grove would have been visible from the White House Tavern grounds. The land steps down towards the Paint branch in a series of gentle slopes. From the White House Tavern an observer would have easily seen the stream valley and the hills of Bladensburg beyond the College of Agriculture (University of Maryland, College Park). An informative view of the lay of the land is found from the observation deck of the 14th floor of the National Agricultural Library which sits on the ground where the Union cavalry was feeding and watering its horses when surprised by Emack's Company B.

John Peter Thompson 2014


Friday, July 26, 2013

The real Prince George of Prince George's County was Danish


Prince George of Denmark, Duke of Comberland Coat of Arms - Wikipedia
           
             UPPER MARLBOROUGH, Md. -  It is so sad that my county, Prince George's, no longer bothers to check in from time to time with history, let alone teach it. For some readers, history does not matter (you may stop reading any further now), which begs the question why, then, send a gift to the new born Prince George of Cambridge.  For those who do think history matters, the dissonance that arises from thinking the future King of Great Britain' name reflects upon the Danish namesake of the county is unnerving. 

               Prince George of Denmark and Norway, Duke of Cumberland (2 April 1653 – 28 October 1708), born in Copenhagen, the younger son of King Frederick III of Denmark and Norway and Sophie Amalie of Brunswick-Lüneburg.  His mother was the sister of Ernest Augustus, Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg, later Elector of Hanover.  was the husband of Queen Anne and distant relative of King George I, first of the German rulers of Great Britain from whom the current House of Windsor descends. King George I was the eldest son of Ernest Augustus, Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg, and his wife, Sophia of the Rhineland Palatinate. Sophia was the granddaughter of King James I of England through her mother, Elizabeth of Bohemia.[1]

               King George V and King George the VI, grandfather and father of the present monarch, Elizabeth II, are the immediate reasons for naming the child George. Prince George the Consort of a Scottish Stuart who slop happened to also rule England, and ultimately unified the dominions into the United Kingdom are not part of the George's of the German House of Hanover which included King George III of revolutionary fame.

               One can only hope that we would try not to twist history to suit our preconceived present and ephemeral vision of glory and focus occasionally on the actual history of this important county in US history.  His Royal Highness Prince George of Denmark and Norway, Duke of Cumberland, was like the county named for him, an important figure in British history but he is far from any reason the reason to name a future King after him. The county does of a strong connection to the United Kingdom and so some remembrance to any British monarch is perhaps in keeping, but the a linking to the coincidence of the same name is not a reason. 

So all together now: 

Prince George's County, Maryland, 
was named in 1695 
after a Danish prince 
who was marry to a 
Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain.
              
               
"Prince George's County, Maryland is wasting no time paying homage to England's new favorite son, Prince George Alexander Louis. Third in line to the British throne, Prince George will always have a connection to Prince George's County -- so says County Executive Rushern Baker. After all, the newborn prince is a namesake. Baker says the county is sending the baby a gift package, which includes a commemorative plate with the county seal on it, a county umbrella, because it is always raining in England and some other keepsakes. The prince also has a standing invitation to visit the county."[2]

"LONDON — In choosing to call their first child George Alexander Louis, Prince William and his wife, Kate, selected a first name steeped in British history.
While “George” means “farmer” and “earth worker” — not trades typically associated with U.K. royals — it has been borne by six British kings, four of whom served in a row.
Below, a look at the British monarchs called George who preceded the nearly week-old prince now third in line to the throne.
GEORGE I: The German-born, first king of Britain from the House of Hanover — which provided six British monarchs — acceded to the throne in 1714. The king — who spoke German, French and a little English — ruled until his death in 1727.

GEORGE II: Initially unpopular, George II gained greater respect as his reign lengthened. He was the last British king to fight alongside his soldiers, at the age of 60. Because his oldest son had died, George II’s grandson inherited the throne upon his death in 1760.

GEORGE III: Upon succeeding his grandfather, George III became the third Hanoverian monarch, and the first to be born in England and use English as a first language. He ruled for nearly 60 years, during which time the American colonies declared independence. Once George III became mentally unfit to rule, his eldest son acted as Prince Regent from 1811. The monarch died in 1820.

GEORGE IV: Prior to assuming the throne, George IV secretly and illegally married a Roman Catholic. He later married Princess Caroline of Brunswick, who he tried unsuccessfully to divorce after assuming the throne in 1820. He was known as much for his marriage difficulties as for his interest in art. His only legitimate child died in childbirth, so the crown went to his brother upon his death in 1830.

GEORGE V: He assumed the throne in 1910, and made hundreds of visits to troops and wounded servicemen during World War I. His legacy also includes starting the sovereign’s annual Christmas Broadcast — a tradition that began in 1932. He died one year after celebrating his silver jubilee, leaving his son Edward to take the throne.

GEORGE VI: The father of Queen Elizabeth II was the most recent King George, memorably portrayed in the Oscar-winning film “The King’s Speech.” His first name was actually Albert, but he selected George — his fourth name — to use as sovereign in honor of his father, George V, and to create stability and continuity in the monarchy following the abdication of his brother, Edward VIII." [3] 










[1] Wikipedia
[2] Prince George's County sending gift box to namesake British prince newborn. Posted: Jul 25, 2013 6:41 PM EDT Updated: Jul 25, 2013 6:47 PM EDT By Karen Gray Houston, @kghfox5dc - bio [accessed July 26, 2013] http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/22935574/prince-georges-county-sending-gift-box-to-namesake-british-prince-newborn#axzz2a9L4A3fC
[3] Some history behind Prince George's name. 2013. Associated Press. [accessed July 27, 2013] http://thetandd.com/some-history-behind-prince-george-s-name/article_6db74e4a-f662-11e2-a3a9-0019bb2963f4.html 





Monday, April 08, 2013

Saturday, April 6th, 2013, the Prince George's Philharmonic treated its audience to a splendid concert


               
Gabriel Cabezas, soloist
Sphinx's 2012 Isaac Stern Award
                 On Saturday, April 6th, 2013, the Prince George's Philharmonic treated its audience to a symphonic evening at the Bowie Center for the Performing Arts, here in Prince George's County, Maryland.

               The orchestra was led by guest conductor, Anthony D. Elliott, Professor of Cello, and Conductor of the Michigan Youth Symphony Orchestra at the University of Michigan.  Mr. Elliott last performed with the Philharmonic on March 31st, 2012 in an "extraordinary rendition" of the Prokofiev Sinfonia Concertante for Cello and Orchestra, Op. 125. [Review: Prince Georgian April 1, 2012]

               This time Maestro Elliott lent his formidable musical talents in support of an amazing young soloist, Gabriel Cabezas, in a performance of one of the great cello concerti, the Saint-Saëns  Concerto for Cello No. 1 in A Minor, Op. 33. At twenty, Mr. Cabezas is the winner of the 15th annual Sphinx Competition, and Sphinx's 2012 Isaac Stern Award. As soloist, he has appeared with the New York Philharmonic, Cleveland Orchestra, Chicago Symphony, the National Symphony of Costa Rica, the Pittsburgh Symphony, the New World Symphony, and the Nashville Symphony. His technical proficiency and musicianship was partnered with the Philharmonic's demonstrated musical ability to showcase and not overwhelm guest soloists. The brilliance of Mr. Cabezas' playing electrified the audience.

Anthony Elliott
Conductor and Cellist

               At the end of the performance, the audience was treated to a very special unannounced performance of the Sonata for Two Cellos in G Major by Jean-Baptiste Barrière (1707 – 1747). With two masters of the instrument playing together the result was magical.  I asked Mr. Ellis about the tonal qualities of the two instruments and he kindly explained to me that Mr. Cabezas played a very good 80 year old American made cello, while Mr. Elliott's instrument was made in Italy in 1703.  

               After intermission, Mr. Elliott conducted the Brahms Symphony No. 2 in D Major, Op. 73. Sometimes referred to as the 'Pastoral' Symphony because of perceived hints of the famous Beethoven's Sixth, and accordingly most times performed with that reference in mind, this time Mr. Elliott brought out what Brahms wrote about his work: that it is "...so melancholy that you will not be able to bear it. I have never written anything so sad, and the score must come out in mourning." The emotional content of music was writ large in Mr. Elliott's performance and the Philharmonic rose to the occasion.

               Mr. Elliott was able to fuse the strings, woodwinds, brass and percussion into a personal tonal statement that supported his interpretation. This fusion of the parts into a whole is distinct from Mr. Ellis, who produces a musical parfait of layered distinct sounds, crystallized in a glittering sound. The Philharmonic's ability to respond to two distinct conducting styles and interpretations is a sign of their splendid professional abilities.

               The evening started with a performance of Roussel's  Bacchus et Ariane, Suite No. 2, Op. 43. I was delighted that Maestro Elliott kept the Prince George's Philharmonic tradition of a musical preview and explanation (with the orchestra playing musical motifs of significance) to help the audience understand what they were about to hear. Mr. Elliott began the night with a wonderful spirited performance.

               The Prince George's Philharmonic continues to dazzle; you really need to come and listen to this first-rate ensemble, a county treasure.

Saturday, May 11, 2013 - 8:00pm
Clarice Smith Performing Arts Center, College Park, MD
Charles Ellis, conductor - Michael Mizrahi, piano

Mozart                      Piano Concerto No. 24 in C Minor, K. 491
Mahler                      Symphony No. 1 in D Major (Titan)



Sunday, March 17, 2013

Baker moves to take-over Prince George's School system


               This morning brings news of a "planned" political take-over of the Prince George's County public school system by the county executive. The news is light on detail; what this means and how would it happen are not included in the reports from the Washington Post. A quick, not-very-thorough-on-my-part review of the County House Delegation's legislation does not provide any useful information.

               We are left with only the broadest concept of a proposal, therefore, which seems to provide a mechanism for the county executive to hold accountable the next superintendent while giving him or her immensely more power. In other words the idea seems to be to make the superintendent answer directly to the county executive.[1]

               The school system is broken at the political level and has been for more than a decade. It is clear that doing the same thing over and over, while at the same time expecting different results, is the very definition of insanity. Change at the top is what is needed, and this change is more than a change of personalities. The change at the top has to be a change in the processes that enable political control of the system through new pathways of accountability for the hard-working qualified professionals who struggle in the winds of our confused, chaotic, parochial politics enabled by powerful self-interests. We need to place success squarely on the shoulders of one person and, then, remove him or her from office by ballot in four years if he or she is unable to produce results.

               It is always hard to weigh in with an opinion before the facts are laid out, but we live in a county where we usually get the facts after a decision is made or at least when it is too late in the process to change a decision substantively. With the opaqueness inherent in our county's political process, it becomes necessary to voice opinion early even at the risk of having to do an about-face when the political elite allows mere mortals to see the actual details of their grand design.

               I reserve judgment until I see the details of the proposal, but conceptually at a very high level I support this structural change in the interest of actually permitting a quality education for our citizens of tomorrow.


[1] Ovetta Wiggins. March 16, 2013. "Prince George’s county executive moves to take over struggling school system". Washington Post. [accessed March 17, 2013] http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/prince-georges-executive-moves-to-take-over-struggling-school-system/2013/03/16/9d38d624-8d81-11e2-9838-d62f083ba93f_story.html

Sunday, January 20, 2013

from the Cultivator Jan 1, 1844: Dearness of Labor - Effects Of Plaster Paris or Gypsum - Irrigation


That land in Europe produces more, acre for acre, than in this country, whether under the plow or down to grass, is not to be attributed to the principles productiveness being there better understood than here, but chiefly to the want of capital and the dearness of agricultural labor in America. Is there any country proprietors possess so little means of improving land proportion to the land they own as in ours? Many the southern states,  owners of hundreds of acres, have not money enough to buy a new saddle; resembling in their condition, that of a man who may be supposed to with cold in the midst of a forest, for want of a spark of fire, or a steel and flint to strike one. Hence the great value of labor saving machinery in our country; and necessity has been aptly called the mother of invention, no country has displayed so much ingenuity as ours in invention of contrivances to economize labor.

                Far from being behind hand in the art of agricultural improvement, no people on the globe excel us agricultural knowledge; nor has any made greater improvement in comparison with the labor at the command of the farmer. Every one understands for example, the  paramount importance of increasing his pile of manure; but in no one thing is the dearness of labor so much as in the quantity of it which is required to collect materials for manure,  and to haul out and distribute it after it is made. Herein consists the great value of gypsum on lands to which it is congenial; for on some, as for instance on the eastern shore of Virginia and Maryland, owing perhaps to their alluvion soil or saline atmosphere, or to both, it is said to have but little effect; while in other parts of both these states, its effect is absolutely magical. The very small quantity required - a bushel to the acre - and the quickness with which it applied, has arrested the progress of exhaustion in some of the counties, which, before it was introduced, were on the high road to ruin. In some other respects its results have been remarkable. It has been the cause in Prince George's county for example, of increasing the possessions and fortune of land holders, and diminishing aggregate population. The rapidity with which large bodies of the poorest could be converted into tobacco land, yielding 1,000 weight to the acre, the high price of that article, and the improvements in the implements and modes of culture, by which planters have come to make four or five hogsheads "to the hand" enabled the enterprising land proprietor and slave owner, to make land purchased on time pay for itself. Thus small proprietors of land, owning few or no slaves were bought out, and moved away to the west. [l]arge estates have been accumulated by individuals, while the actual population of that county, perhaps the most productive in the state, and within striking of Baltimore, with its population of 100,000 inhabitants, and bordering on the cities of the District of Columbia,  has diminished from 20,216 in 1820, to 19,539 in 1840.

               The following are among many similar cases to show the operation of the influences to which I have referred; the facts are stated on indubitable authority. The Governor Robert Bowie, a man of singular energy of character and of the highest moral worth, at the time under the state of things already referred to, purchased two hundred acres of poor "broom sedge" land for $1400. He put half of it in corn, and probably gathered not more than 10 or 15 bushels to the acre, sowed it down to oats he next spring, and on them sowed clover and plaster of Paris or gypsum. Plastered the clover the succeeding spring, and the spring following planted in tobacco, and sold from it 100,000 weight at $10 per hundred; making $10,000 for half of the land, which three years before he had purchased probably "on time," for $1400! Many similar instances might be given of effects of plaster of Paris in producing all the results I have stated, but I am wandering from my subject.

                Much and effectively as our ingenuity has been in the invention of every expedient to save labor, it seems to me that there is one means of augmenting our crops grass in a manner as wonderful or at least as great as the effect of plaster of Paris on cultivated crops - which is much practiced in some parts of Europe, but neglected in a country where of all others, circumstances invite the use of it - I mean Irrigation.

                You, Mr. Editor, would render an essential service to American Husbandry, if you would yourself give, or prevail upon some one to give an essay on that subject; especially if you have at your command, so far, the offices of some correspondent who has seen the manner in which irrigation is conducted in Europe. I know a great man who could do it, but the game would hardly be worthy of the falcon. If I had time, I would collect the materials and digest such an essay, were it only for the benefit of a few friends who have all the resources for irrigation at command.
                                                                                      I. S. S.  

Washington Jan 1 1844

transcribed by John Peter Thompson from:
Luther Tucker, ed. The Cultivator, A Monthly Journal to Agriculture, Horticulture, Floriculture and to Domestsic and Rural Economy. Vol. 1. New York. Luther Tucker, Publisher. p. 60. 

Friday, December 07, 2012

Peace Cross Monument, Bladensburg & Upper Marlboro Memorial to Veterans of World War I from Prince George's County


Copied from
November 1973 
Vol – 1, No – 9

 CONCERNING VETERAN’S DAY

               Early in the years of the Great Depression, as a first grader, the real meaning of November 11th was impressed upon this writer. At 11 AM the school bell was rung and the children of all grades stood beside their desks for a minute of silence in commemoration of the Armistice which brought the Great War of 1914-1918 to an end.

               Since 1918 the United States has been engaged in three other major conflicts and Armistice Day has been changed to Veterans’ Day in honor of all those who have served. This change is understandable. It is difficult to accept, however, the latest tampering with Veterans’ Day. We refer to placing it on a Monday in October in order to provide a three-day holiday which is also becoming a gigantic sale day, in competition with the birthday of George Washington. Hopefully, without sounding too old-fashioned or sentimental, it is our feeling that it would be better to designate the October date as simply a “Business Holiday” and not designate the memory of those who served by calling it Veterans’ Day. Under the circumstances where the meaning of the holiday is almost completely lost, better no Veterans’ Day at all.

               Harking back to the Great War of 1914-1918, it is interesting to note that there are two memorials in Prince George’s County which were erected to the memory of all of the citizens of the County who lost their lives in that conflict. In 1919, just one year after the Armistice, the County erected a monument (fountain) on the Court House lawn, bordering Main Street in Upper Marlboro. In recent years the location of the monument was changed to the far left side of the lawn, set back from the street.

               The Upper Marlboro bears the following inscription:

THE RIGHT WILL PREVAIL

This monument perpetuates the memory of the sons and daughters of Prince George’s County who true to the tradition of their County To the spirit of that service, tribute is here paid by a grateful people. J. M. Miller, Sc.(ulptor) W. G. Bucher, Arch.(itect) J. Arthur Emerick Co., Founders, Baltimore A.D. 1919

               On the opposite side of the monument is the following inscription:

ERECTED 1919 These men from Prince George’s County made the supreme sacrifice defending the liberty of mankind.
(The list of names follows.)



Bladensburg, Prince George's County, Maryland,
Peace Cross Monument
World War  I Memorial
picture by
John Peter Thompson,
Chair
Pri. Geo.'s Historic Preservation Commission 2012
               The most well known of the two memorials in Prince George’s, primarily because of its imposing size and its location, is the Peace Cross Monument in Bladensburg. Situated in the center of the intersection of two major arteries, Bladensburg Road (Rt. 1) and Defense Highway (Rt. 240, old Rt. 40), it has achieved landmark status over the years.
 (Until recent years it was the point of reference for the famous Bladensburg floods.)
               
The fund drive for the famous Peace Cross was begun early in 1919 by Mr. John Riggles of Lanham and Mrs. J.H. Norman of Hyattsville. Individual contributions ranged from 50¢ to $100, and the three local newspapers (The Washington Star, The Times and the Washington Post) as well as three department stores (Woodward & Lothrop, S. Kann & Sons and Lansburg Bros.) each contributed $100.

               Numerous benefits were held and a total of $1,523.16 was collected, but the drive began to wind down by late 1920. At this point the Snyder-Farmer Post of the American Legion agreed to assume responsibility for the completion of the Peace Cross. Snyder-Farmer Post No. 3 of the American Legion was officially recognized on July 8, 1919, the third in the State of Maryland.

               Most of the Legionnaires had been members of Hyattsville’s old Company F, Maryland National Guard, which became part of the 115th Infantry when they were mustered into federal service andsent to France. (A charter member from another part of the County was the late Rep. Lansdale G. Sasscer of Upper Marlboro.) The Post was named for Maurice B. Snyder and George W. Farmer, both of Hyattsville, who lost their lives on October 8, 1918 in the Meuse-Argonne Offensive. The Peace cross was dedicated on July 12, 1925. The total cost, including the wall around the mound to protect it from the floods, was approximately $25,000. Of this amount, about $23,000 was raised and donated by Post No. 3.

               At the base of the huge cross these four words appear on each side:

VALOR, ENDURANCE, COURAGE, DEVOTION

On the face of the cross at the junction of the two arms is a gold star bearing the letters “U.S.” in red in the center. Encircling the Star is a blue wreath. The inscription on the bronze tablet is as follows:

1917 This Memorial Cross 1918 dedicated to the heroes of Prince George’s County, Maryland, who lost their lives in the Great War for the Liberty of the World.

Albert N. Baden                     H. Irvin Dennison                       Ernest O. Gardner
Henry H. Boswell                   Wilmer A. Disney                      Milton E. Hartmen
Herman E. Burgess                 Joseph B. Edelen                      Thomas E. Hawkins
Clarence Butler                       George W. Farmer                   Frank Holmes
Vincent G. Cooley                  Thomas N. Fenwick                 Henry Lewis Hulbert
James Cooper                        Edward H. Fletcher                  Charles E. Huntemann
Matthew Curtin                      Joseph Henry Ford                   William Lee
E. Pendleton Magruder          William Redmond                      Edward Shoults
E. Monshuer Maxwell            Frank Richmond                       Albert Smith
Clarence McCausland            Henry P. Robinson                    Maurice B. Snyder
Lee Earle Merson                   Theodore Rochester                 John A. Sprigg
Howard H. Morrow               Frank C. Rorabaugh                Pierre C. Stevens
Isaac Parker                           Robert C. Rusk                       Kenneth P. Strawn
James F. Quisenberry             John H. Seaburn                      William A. Tayman
Elmer Thomas                        Elzie Ellis Turner                      Walter E. Wilson
Benjamin E. Thompson          Herbert J. White                       Herman Winter

Sunday, November 25, 2012

Several thousand turkies [sic] may be hired out in Prince George's county (1819)


               Mr. Skinner, - I beg you to encourage your fare readers, (who are under great obligation to you for your endeavors to improve their husbands and their husbands' lands,) to attend to their poulty yards, by letting them see how profitable they may be made.[1]

               I state from good authority, that several thousand turkies [sic] may be hired out in Prince George's county, during the past summer, at the rate of twenty-five cents a piece per month and found. They will be returned when their work is done, and if any are overworked or die from any other cause, they will be paid for at the rate of 75 cents each.

               Some of your distant readers, who know nothing about tobacco, may think this a quiz. But I assure you, these wages were actually offered the last summer. Now it will certainly be desirable to encourage the breeding of this useful animal, and after having helped the planter in his crop, the turkies themselves will be almost as good shewing as the tobacco, and if they are killed pretty soon in the season. they may even have a fine relish of it.    I am, Sir, yours,   A. Chewer.

               Note - The Editor of the American Farmer, being the agent through whom all communications passed between the government, and the commanding officer of the enemy's squadron in the Chesapeake during the war [of 1812], had frequent occasion to go on board, where he was often compelled either to "keep fast" or to dine on poultry and live stock plundered from his own countrymen and friends. He recollects that dining with Admiral Warren the day that a large detachment advanced upon St. Michaels, in Septmebr, he was invited to partake of some "turkey poults and oysters," -- It was the first time he had heard the term, and never having seen turkies eaten at that age, knew not what they meant. --They were the size of dunghill fowls, and no doubt thoroughly impregnated with the contents of tobacco worms. Hew declined the invitation, and dinner being removed, he took occasion to explain to them, as ou correspondent has done, their great utility in devouring tobacco worms at that season, and we have some reason to hope, that this insight into the natural history and propensities of the nice :turkey poults," had the effect of saving the flocks of many good house wives from the ravages of an an enemy, from whose rapacity nothing was too sacred or too humble to escape.



[1]   American Farmer Date: 10-15-1819; Volume: I; Issue: 29; Page: Page 231; Location: Baltimore, Maryland

Thursday, October 11, 2012

The first concert of the 2012-2013 season of the Prince George's Philharmonic


The first concert of the 2012-2013 season of the Prince George's Philharmonic is set to take place Saturday, October 13, 2012 at 8:00 pm at The Bowie Center for the Performing Arts, Bowie Maryland. Click here for directions.

The program features violinist Maria Ioudenitch, a 2012 Johansen International Competition Winner, in a performance of Mendelssohn's Violin Concerto. The concert opens with Richard Wagner's Prelude to Die Meistersinger. These first two works will be led by our Music Director, Charles Ellis. Shawn Storer, our Associate Conductor, will lead the second half of the concert with one of Tchaikovsky's perennial favorites, his Symphony No. 4.


Saturday, October 13, 2012 - 8:00pm
Bowie Center for the Performing Arts, Bowie, MD
Charles Ellis and Shawn Storer, conductors
Maria Ioudenitch, violin, Johansen International Competition Winner

Wagner                       Prelude to Die Meistersinger
Mendelssohn              Violin Concerto in E Minor, Op. 64
Tchaikovsky                Symphony No. 4 in F Minor, Op. 36

Artist Interview with Maria Ioudenitch

by Susan Pearl

 


QN: Thank you so much, Maria, for taking the time to talk to us today. We are very much looking forward to performing the Mendelssohn Violin Concerto with you at our October concert. Could we start with a little about your training so far and your plans for the future?

MI: I began playing the violin when I was three years old, and am now studying with Professor Ben Sayevich at the International Center for Music at Park University (Missouri). I still have two more years of high school, and I then hope to concentrate on violin performance studies with a solo career as my goal.

QN: You come from a very distinguished musical family - your father won a gold medal at the Van Cliburn International Piano Competition in 2001, and both of your parents are greatly involved not only in piano performance, but in musical education.

MI: Yes, they are very busy people, and have recently spent time in China where my father was performing and giving master classes, and my mother was teaching. I owe them so much! When I was three years old they gave me a violin - a tiny 1/16 size instrument! Most of my family members were and are pianists, but my grandfather was a violinist - I guess it seemed right that I should take up the violin.

QN: We understand that you began this year to enter performance competitions, and that you took first prize in the Kansas City Symphony Young Artist Competition, with the result that you played the Khachaturian concerto with the Kansas City Orchestra. Congratulations! And of course it is your success at this spring's Johansen International Competition that brings you to solo with the Prince George's Philharmonic. Can you tell us a little about the experience of participating in these competitions?

MI: Yes, taking part in these competitions is quite wonderful, and it's a special learning experience for a young performer. The Young Artists Competition was wonderful for several reasons. It was a blind competition, which means that the judges were separated from the competitors, and did not know who the performers were. I found that this relieved the pressure - I could forget about the judges and truly play for the joy and the beauty of the music.

QN: And we are so pleased that because of your success at the Johansen, you will be playing the wonderful Mendelssohn concerto with our Philharmonic. So let us finish our conversation by talking about this wonderful concerto, and some of your feelings about it.

MI: I think that the Mendelssohn Violin Concerto is one of the most beautifully pure pieces of music ever written. In some ways it is not quite as complex as the Beethoven or the Brahms concerto, but it has such beauty in its purity. The first movement is very lively, but the progress is so fluid into the second movement, which seems so deceptively simple. And then, again, it so perfectly plunges right into the very festive third movement finale. I've been working on this beautiful concerto for about three months, and I love





Tuesday, August 07, 2012

Gambling and Gaming have a long history in Maryland

The business model of the gaming and gambling industry is to make a profit by taking as much money, credit and assets from their customers and patrons as quickly and often as possible while spending as little as possible on operation expenses including various taxes.

When tied into a entertainment destination site, gaming and gambling become part of a solid marketing plan that provides an attraction complete with additional reasons to choose National Harbor in Prince George's County for meetings, conventions, business and recreation.

It does seem that we have been here before, though.

An ACT to prevent excessive gaming Lib No a fol 762
WHEREAS it hath been represented to this general assembly that certain persons as well citizens of this as of other states and foreigners carry about with them from one public place another in this state certain gambling machines or inventions calculated to deceive and defraud innocent and unguarded to the prejudice of society and the corruption of morals; and this assembly being desirous to put a stop to such pernicious and baneful effects, 
therefore,
11 ENACTED by the General Assembly of Maryland That after the passage of this act no E. O. A. B. C. L. S. D., or faro table or other device except billiard tables for the purpose of gaming or money shall be set up kept or maintained in any dwelling house out house or place occupied by any tavern keeper retailer of wine spirituous liquors heer or cider whether such person have a license or not on pain of forfeiting every such EOABCLSD table or other device and of forfeiting moreover for every offence the sum of fifty pounds current money upon convietion thereof by indictment or confession in the county court of the county wherein the offence shall committed. November 1797


 The Laws of Maryland: 1785-1799. Volume 2 of The Laws of Maryland: To which are Prefixed the Original Charter, with an English Translation, the Bill of Rights and Constitution of the State, as Originally Adopted by the Convention, with the Several Alterations by Acts of Assembly, the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution of the General Government, and the Amendments Made Thereto, with an Index to the Laws, the Bill of Rights, and the Constitution, William Kilty. 1800


http://books.google.com/books?id=SZxaAAAAYAAJ&lpg=PT768&ots=bIIT8sw5eQ&dq=gambling%20prince%20george's%20county%20maryland&pg=PT768#v=onepage&q=gambling%20prince%20george's%20county%20maryland&f=false

Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Melwood Park, Prince George's County, Maryland, open house tours



Melwood Park open house tours:


This unique dwelling was visited by George Washington on several occasions and the British Army camped here during their march to Washington, D.C. in August 1814, during the War of 1812.

Address:  “Melwood Park” - 10908 Old Marlboro Pike, Upper Marlboro, MD 20772

Date:  Saturday, August 18 and Saturday, August 25, Saturday, September 8 and Saturday, September 15

Time:  Two tours will be given on each day, the first at 12:00 pm and the second at 2:30 pm

Contact:  Michael Vallen - michael.vallen@melwoodparke.org

                                - He is working on getting a phone line set up to receive calls about these tours, however at this point email is the best way to contact him.

Additional Info:  - Parking is available on site if needed, however we are also looking into the possibility of parking at the park located next door. 

 - Water and restrooms will also be available on site. 

 - He is asking for something small, 
perhaps a $5 donation to go towards the building fund.

 “Melwood Park” website with additional information and building history can be found:  

Melwood Park,  listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1976, is an unusual surviving example of early Prince George's County architecture. It was constructed ca. 1750 by the prominent Digges family, and is quite large and finely detailed for that period. Dwellings of this early settlement period in Prince George's County were generally smaller, more impermanent and of vernacular, rather than a more academically inspired Georgian style as seen at Melwood park. Few exhibited the architectural detailing of Melwood Park which reflects the wealth and social status of the Digges family. The fact that it has survived relatively intact is even more rare. Once the
"mansion house" of a large tobacco plantation, Melwood Park was reduced to a small tenant farm over the past hundred years or so.