current info

An old Cherokee is teaching his grandson about life. "A fight is going on inside me," he said to the boy.


"It is a terrible fight and it is between two wolves. One is evil—he is anger, envy, sorrow, regret, greed, arrogance, self-pity, guilt, resentment, inferiority, lies, false pride, superiority, and ego." He continued, "The other is good—he is joy, peace, love, hope, serenity, humility, kindness, benevolence, empathy, generosity, truth, compassion, and faith. The same fight is going on inside you—and inside every other person, too."

The grandson thought about it for a minute and then asked his grandfather, "Which wolf will win?"

The old Cherokee simply replied, "The one you feed."

First People - The Legends. Cherokee Legend of Two Wolves. November 16, 2004. [accessed April 7, 2012].

Friday, January 27, 2012

A Brief History Of The Marlboro High School/Elementary School - Part Two of Two


reprinted courtesy of the PGCHS (Prince George's County Historical Society)
 "News & Notes", Volume XLI, Number 1, Jan/Feb 2012.[1]

see also:



·       Prince George's Files to Demolish Historic School by Erich Wagner. Gazette, January 26, 2012




Part Two of Two

A BRIEF HISTORY OF

THE MARLBORO HIGH SCHOOL/ELEMENTARY SCHOOL




Continues from part one:
               We have several contemporary descriptions of the Academy during the 19th century, the most charming being the reminiscences of Frederick Sasscer, Superintendent of Schools for Prince George’s County, and Editor of the Upper Marlborough newspaper, the Prince George’s Enquirer.  Towards the end of 1920, Editor Sasscer was temporarily confined to bed, and he used the time to write and publish in his newspaper “reminiscences “ of his childhood in Upper Marlborough in the years just after the Civil War.  “My little heart fluttered with excitement when, without warning, on a bright autumn morning in 1863 my father announced at the breakfast table that I, the eldest child, was to begin my school career.  Accordingly, he led me to Academy Hill and introduced me to Mr. Edward Bushell unto whose tender mercies I was committed . . . my father took leave and I well remember how I cried when I realized I could not return home with him . . . . soon I became a part of that little school circle . .  . by the next day I had grown big enough and brave enough to go to school and return all by myself.”  [Young Frederick Sasscer lived at Kingston, just a short distance south of Academy Hill.  The Academy building that he attended had been built only eight years earlier to replace the old Beanes residence that had been destroyed by fire.] 
               Editor Sasscer continued, “The Academy building then consisted of two rooms, one of which was the school room and the other the bed room of the professor. . . .  His classes, wonderful to tell, ranged from boys learning the alphabet, the first step in education, then to classes in Cicero and Xenophon. . . . The furniture was of the rudest kind.  Desks with sloping lids in sets of three, in all about 30, were arranged against the walls. . . . The very small boys, who had no writing to do, found resting places on two long benches with backs.  There were no blackboards, no free books and few physical comforts.  The old professor sat at a small table in an arm chair, and was always supplied with a goodly number of supple rods, for the rod was not spared in those primitive days.” 
               Sasscer went on to contrast the simplicity of his mid-19th-century schooling with the improvements that he had seen by 1920 (he had served as Superintendent of Prince George’s County schools 1902-1914, and had been an innovative and progressive leader), and he noted that Upper Marlboro would soon have a new high school.  He referred also to the fact that in 1908 the Academy property had been turned over to the Board of County School Commissioners, and that this 1855 building had thenceforward been used as a public high school – “. . . the trustees and patrons of the Marlboro Academy desire the establishment of a High School at the County Seat . . . it is ordered that a committee be appointed  . . . with authority to enter into an agreement whereby the property of said Academy . . . . may be used for said proposed High School to be established under the provisions of the General School Law relating to the opening of High Schools.”  In 1920, Mr. Sasscer recalled that transition, which had occurred during his tenure as superintendent, and looked forward to the construction of the new high school which would be completed in the following year.            “The old Academy lost its identity about twelve years ago, when the property was turned over to the School Board in order that the present High School might be established, and our boys and girls alike might enjoy the benefits of instruction in the higher grades. . . . . May the new High School building soon to be erected embody in its conveniences all the comforts of the new age, and may the children of the present generation and of generations to come find keen delight and rich enlightenment within its walls!”
               The Mission-style two-story high school of 1921 can still be seen at the rear of the present building, Built by Thomas H. Marsden for $38,000, it was of masonry construction, coated with white-painted cement, and distinguished by a handsome shaped parapet on its south entrance façade.  It had eight classrooms, offices and a library, as well as rooms for manual training and home economics.  The new school was dedicated on May 19, 1921, with considerable ceremony, and a lengthy speech about the very historical Academy that it was replacing. Soon after the high school opened, elementary school classes also began in the new building.   During the 1930s, the building was significantly enlarged - a large red-brick addition including eight more classrooms and an auditorium was built, wrapping around and hiding the south entrance façade of the original 1921 structure.  In the 1940s, the original 1921 building was used to house the elementary students, while the newer red-brick structure operated as the High School.  After the construction of Frederick Sasscer Junior/Senior High School in 1947, the older students moved to that new school, and elementary school classrooms took up the entire structure on Academy Hill.  Known now as the Old Marlboro Elementary School, this building was closed by the early 1970s.  For years after that, it served as the office of the Sheriff’s Department.
               From 1835, when the Marlborough Academy was established, until the 1970s, this site has been an important educational landmark in the County Seat.  We will keep you posted as plans for its site unfold.
                                    

[1] personal email.  Prince George's County Historical Society. January 21, 2012. http://www.pghistory.org/  

Thursday, January 26, 2012

A Brief History Of The Marlboro High School/Elementary School - Part One of Two


reprinted courtesy of the PGCHS (Prince George's County Historical Society)
 "News & Notes", Volume XLI, Number 1, Jan/Feb 2012.[1]

see also:




 Part One of Two


A BRIEF HISTORY OF
THE MARLBORO HIGH SCHOOL/ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

People and groups with an interest in the history of our County have recently been alerted to the proposed demolition of the building known as OMES – the Old Marlboro Elementary School, the original part of which was built as the Marlboro High School in 1921.  The proposal includes the construction (on the site of this school building) of a Family Justice Center that would combine all of the offices necessary to serve individuals and families in need of assistance.  There are of course serious logistical problems that would have to be resolved before proceeding with such a plan, but the Historical Society will concentrate on the historical value of the school building and site, and the consideration of potential adaptive re-use and possible preservation.  The Society’s Board plans to host as soon as possible an informational meeting and discussion on the subject.  The property has been designated an Historic Site under the County’s Preservation Ordinance, because of its importance in the history of education of the white students of the area.  It contains not only the High School/Elementary School building, but also the separate, adjoining small principal’s residence (originally 1890s girls’ school), and the burial place of Dr. William Beanes and his wife.
This is the property on which Dr. William Beanes lived in the early 19th century.  Dr Beanes was the Upper Marlborough resident who was taken as a hostage by the British invaders in the summer of 1814, because he and several of his friends had captured several British deserters/stragglers.  (He was taken to Baltimore, and it was during the attempts of Francis Scott Key to liberate Dr. Beanes, that Key wrote the lyrics to what became our National Anthem.)  Dr. Beanes returned to Upper Marlborough, and lived on this property until his death in 1828; he and his wife are buried on the property, and their burial place has been carefully preserved, although it is currently in need of attention.
               After Dr. Beanes’ death, his house was altered to become the new Marlborough Academy, established in 1835 by an Act of the General Assembly of Maryland.  The subjects taught included Dictionary, Geography, Latin, algebra, Geometry, and Cyphering; Greek and French studies were soon added. Hours were 8:00 a.m.to 5:30 p.m., and September was vacation month.  At first only boys were admitted, but by 1840 there were female students as well; a report for 1844 indicates the attendance of 42 boys and 18 girls.  (In 1867, after the establishment of the Board of County School Commissioners, a separate public school for girls was established immediately east of the academy building, and the two buildings were separated by a “good and substantial fence.”)
               In July of 1855 the Academy building burned to the ground.  The Upper Marlborough newspaper, The Planters’ Advocate, reported that “The buildings of the Marlboro’ Academy, in this place, were destroyed by fire on the afternoon of last Friday. . . .  The fire originated in the garret room of the Academy proper, whence it communicated to the adjoining dwelling of the Principal.  The latter was not occupied at the time but was in a state of repair – a considerable sum having been already expended in refitting it, all of which is of course a loss.  The fire was not discovered until between 6 and 7 o’clock, and no signs of it were observed at the time school was dismissed about two hours previously. . . . The dwelling portion of the building was one of the oldest houses in the village and was for many years the dwelling of the late Dr. William Beanes.”  The building had fortunately been insured, and a new academy building was erected by the end of December in that year. 


continued part two


[1] personal email.  Prince George's County Historical Society. January 21, 2012. http://www.pghistory.org/  

...to be continued

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Public Planning Forum: Where and how should Prince George's grow? Thursday, January 26, 2012, from 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM


               Planning In Prince George's County is well thought out on a grand scale but ignored when convenient. The triple tiers of developed, developing and rural serve as broad guidelines for a future but not necessarily the future. In an attempt to bring predictability and professionalism to the land use planning process, M-NCPPC was created by the Maryland General Assembly in 1927 to develop and operate public park systems and provide land use planning for the physical development of the majority of Montgomery and Prince George's Counties, and to operate the public recreation program in Prince George's County. State-of-the-art facilities and national, regional and state award-winning programs have been the result. The county planning department is charged with helping to "...preserve, protect and manage the County's resources by providing the highest quality planning services and growth management guidance and by facilitating effective intergovernmental and citizen involvement through education and technical assistance."[1]       

               Prince George's County's growing population brings an ever greater interest in land development processes and the public and private services that its citizens expect. The planning department values community engagement and is committed to enhancing knowledge and participation of the public in every element of its work. All too often the citizens of the county, however, feel they are left out of the process because of pressing family or business concerns which are not focused at that moment on the long range concept and planning opportunities to participate early in the planning process. In other words, we get excited and vocal when the construction is ready to roll feeling left out of the visioning and conceptual piece of the process. Part of this is the demand on time and perhaps someday Prince George's County will have webinar and wiki planning sessions so that residents can attend and participate on line as well as in person in all the stages of planning.

               Be that what it may, tomorrow the planning department is holding a public forum:      Where and how should Prince George's grow?[2] 

               The forum appears to be in collaboration with Coalition for Smarter Growth.[3]

Event date: Thursday, January 26, 2012, from 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM
Location: CSC Building, 7900 Harkins Road, Lanham - by New Carrollton Metro station

Date:    Thursday, January 26, 2012
Time:   6:30 p.m. - 8:00 p.m.
Location:          CSC Building, 7900 Harkins Road, Lanham - by New Carrollton Metro station
Contact:            RSVP Required. Click here to RSVP.

Comments:     
Prince George’s grew by seven percent over the last decade, yet little of it occurred at the 15 Metro stations or in established town centers. Beginning in 2002, the county adopted a General Plan to provide an overall land use approach to focus growth at transit stations, in new and existing town centers, and to preserve rural lands. However, much of the county’s growth over the last decade spread out across former fields and forests, and far from transit stations. The county is preparing to launch a update to its General Plan to guide where and how the county should grow.

This forum will begin a public conversation around how to plan a better future for Prince George’s by taking stock of past experience and addressing changing needs and emerging trends for the county and the region. Hear from a former County Council Chairman, a new Council Member, and the county’s leading economic development advisor on their vision for guiding a more prosperous and sustainable county in the future.

Moderator:
Derick Berlage, Chief of Countywide Planning, Prince George's County Planning Department

Panel:
Mel Franklin, District 9 County Council Member

David Harrington, former Prince George’s County Council Chair, State Senator and Bladensburg Mayor

David Iannucci, Assistant Deputy Chief Administrative Officer for Economic Development, Office of the County Executive, Prince George's County




[1] About Planning. [accessed January 25, 2012] http://www.pgplanning.org/About-Planning.htm
[3] Coalition for Smarter Growth. Partner Organizations: Piedmont Environmental Council; Audubon Naturalist Society; Sierra Club; Clean Water Action; Chesapeake Bay Foundation; Partnership for Smarter Growth; Southern Environmental Law Center; Surface Transportation Policy Project; Friends of the Earth/DC Environmental Network;
Environmental Defense; Prince William Conservation Alliance; Campaign for Loudoun's Future;
Montgomery Countryside Alliance [accessed January 25, 2012] http://smartergrowth.net/anx/index.cfm/1,104,521,0,html/CSG-Partner-Organizations


Tuesday, January 24, 2012

What will it take to reduce the cost of cleaning up the litter, trash and pollution in our County?






Jon Devine’s Blog

Taking Out the Trash


           
                    "What will it take to turn the corner on restoring the environmental (and economical) treasure that is the Chesapeake Bay?", asks Anne Arundel County Councilman, Chris Trumbauer.[1]  Delegate Lafferty (D - Dsitrict42, Baltimore County) is proposing legislation to require  "...the operator of specified stores to establish an at-store recycling program for plastic carryout bags; requiring specified stores to print or display specified language on plastic carryout bags; requiring specified stores to provide collection bins for the recycling of plastic carryout bags"[2]  HB 169 is an attempt to do more than wish the Chesapeake Bay and our local landscapes clean of litter and pollution. The significant change in our ecosystem resources means that the "free" services upon which we depend are changing. Trash in the waterways is just one symptom of the degradation of the environment in which everyone of is lives. And because we may not see the trash or the damage, it does not follow that it is not there.
               CouncilpersonTrumbauer points out that "[w] need to consider the long-term impacts of an impaired Bay when we consider the current investments needed to secure our fisheries, recreational activities, maritime industry, and other benefits of a restored Bay."[3]  The costs of throwing our trash into the common areas is not zero; externalizing our trash onto others is a significant cost to everyone. Allowing trash and pollution to enter into the river systems and open spaces is a form of taxation; a cost to everyone. So the question is why should I pay so that you can make a profit at my expense? Why shouldn't the litterer, who is not thinking about future ecological impacts at the moment, pay for the ease of disposal?
               Without a willingness to try new things we are doomed to sink into a landscape filled with litter, trash, pollution and waste. Is this what we want our community to look like?.  Prince George's County spent $2.15 million on for picking up roadside trash in the 2007 and $2.72 million in the 2008. Any thoughts to how much we are paying today?  And the costs for picking up roadside trash in Prince George’s in those years were nearly two to three times higher than for other metropolitan counties in the Washington-Baltimore region.[4]  It is evident to me that voluntary measures are not enough, that I am paying an ever increasing amount in taxes to clean up after someone has externalized his or her trash into the environment because perhaps it took too long to find a trash can or because it was simply easer at the moment to use the supposedly infinite service of the ecosystem to remove the litter from sight.
               There should be a discussion about accountability for personal and corporate actions. We ought to explore new ways to meet the challenges of an increasing population with a corresponding decrease of natural resources. And yes resources are decreasing, for after all there is a finite amount of land on to which to throw our trash, and a fixed amount of water to receive it. Addressing these issues is PG 402-12, sponsored by Delegate Barbara A. Frush (Democrat, District 21, Anne Arundel & Prince George's Counties, Prince George's County - Authority to Impose Fees for Use of Disposable Bags authorize "Prince George's County to impose, by law, a fee on certain retail establishments for use of disposable bags under certain circumstances; defining certain terms; and generally relating to the authority for Prince George's County to impose a fee for use of disposable bags."[5]   Some consider this a new additional tax, but it is not; the clean-up tax already exists imposed on all of us by the wanton act of throwing  trash without a care or thought into the ecosystem,  

[1] Chris Trumbauer,  Anne Arundel County Councilman.  It’s Time to Put Up or Shut Up. January 21, 2012 [accessed January 23, 2012] http://www.bayactionplan.com/2012/01/it%E2%80%99s-time-to-put-up-or-shut-up/

[2] HOUSE BILL 169. Bill is in the House - First Reading Environmental Matters. [accessed January 24, 2012] http://mlis.state.md.us/2012rs/billfile/HB0169.htm

[3] Chris Trumbauer,  Anne Arundel County Councilman.  It’s Time to Put Up or Shut Up. January 21, 2012 [accessed January 23, 2012] http://www.bayactionplan.com/2012/01/it%E2%80%99s-time-to-put-up-or-shut-up/

[4] Margie Hyslop. County’s costs for roadside cleanup are highest in state. Gazette.net. July 31, 2008. [accessed January 24, 2012] http://ww2.gazette.net/stories/073108/prinnew185442_32358.shtml

[5] Legislation - Bill History: PG 402-12 Prince George's County - Authority to Impose Fees for Use of Disposable Bags [accessed January 24, 2012] http://www.princegeorgeshousedelegation.com/legislation/bill-history?local=PG%20402-12  

Monday, January 23, 2012

Gambling & Politics: Anonymous Prince George's Comments


Tracing Technology and its Effects on Slot Machines

                       The ever-present Anonymous of Prince George's County left a comment on my blog from December 28, 2011, Anonymous support for gambling in Prince George's County Maryland. In my last blog, What do We Know about Gambling, Gaming, Casinos & Economic Development in Prince George's County, Maryland?, I asked for any links to detailed reports. 

                   Today, with special thanks to Delegate Levi (D-23A Pri. Geo's), I now am reading the 128 page report from 2004, The Economic and Social Impacts of Racetrack Video Lottery Terminals on the City of Baltimore and Prince George’s County.[1]

               I am intrigued by some of the detailed information in this report. For example, the report notes that the slots industry, when established  in Prince George's County, would create an impressive 3,866 jobs in the county. Then I read  the gaming or gambling industry's purported  wage of $12,491 per year. The report also notes that there would be significant short term construction jobs at a higher rate.[2]


               I also found in the 2004 report the curious presentation of educational statistics for Atlantic City casino workers to be a form of faint praise at best for bringing gambling to Prince George's County. For a county that should be an international leader in Science, Technology, Engineering and Innovation, only14.8% of the casino workers had 4 years of college or more. 


               Of course this means that the gaming industry will provide work for those of us without higher learning and that is a good thing for we too need jobs. However the wage statistics indicate an hourly median figure of $11.25, hardly a living wage, but better than nothing.[3] The question remains is this how high (or low) are we setting the bar of expectations and excellence that this county wants and deserves? Besides slots and malls, what else do we have in the pipeline?  

               Below is the Prince George's Anonymous comment without comment from me, at least today.

               Mr. Thompson writes again that he supports gambling but questions the mismanagement of the potential tax revenue generated and the supposed benefits derived from the increased county and state taxes. He then questions Prince Georgians decision making as if we are incapable as he wonders why if gambling were such a good idea how come Bethesda and Potomac are not clamoring for a gambling operation?

               These two areas have been bolstered by BRAC, the influx of government jobs, and technology. For some odd reason or another our US Representatives, Congressman Steny Hoyer and Congressman Chris Van Hollen who are two of the highest ranking Congressmen have not been able or choose not to move the above into Prince George's County to bolster our economy. We not only have the government not wanting to move into our County but there is also a lack of private businesses desiring to move into Prince George's County. Our residents need jobs. We must either somehow figure out how to capitalize off the businesses who are willing to move here and incentivize others to move here or we must learn to use our voting power and elect those into office who will look out after Prince Georgians and ensure we ge the types of jobs and businesses we deserve in our county. 




[1] Optimal Solutions Group. The Economic and Social Impacts of Racetrack Video Lottery Terminals on the City of Baltimore and Prince George’s County. Commissioned By: The Presidents’ RoundTable, Inc. & Greater Prince George’s Business Roundtable, Inc. February 2004. [accessed January 22, 2012] http://www.responsiblegambling.org/articles/economic_and_social_impacts_racetrack_vlt_baltimore.pdf
[2] ibid. page 34
[3] Occupational Employment Statistics. National Industry-Specific Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates NAICS 713200 - Gambling Industries. May 2010. [accessed January 22, 2012] http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_713200.htm

Sunday, January 22, 2012

Informational Meeting on the Issues Regarding the Old Marlboro Elementary School (originally built as the Marlboro High School in 1921)


On December 23rd, 2011 I posted Connecting the Dots: Upper Marlboro seeks input on historic school’s fate - Washington Business Journal. 

The Prince George's County Historical Society and the Town of Upper Marlboro are sponsoring an informational gathering on the issue regarding the Old Marlboro Elementary School (originally built as the Marlboro High School in 1921) at 14524 Elm Street, Upper Marlboro. 

This meeting will be held on THURSDAY, 16 FEBRUARY 2012, at 7:00 p.m., at the Parish Hall of Trinity Church, 14519 Church Street in Upper Marlboro.


As you may have read, the County is considering demolishing the school building in order to build in its place a new Family Justice Center - there are logistical problems regarding the site, and because the school property is a designated Historic Site under the County's Historic Preservation Ordinance, it is important that we have a good public discussion of the issue before the case comes before the Historic Preservation Commission the following week. 

We are sending out notice of this meeting to a number of organizations and individuals who should have an interest in the subject. Any ideas you have on the subject will be much appreciated. Steve Sonnett, President of the Town of Upper Marlboro Commissioners, is preparing a press release on the subject. 

Please be sure that your organization is represented at this meeting!

INFORMATIONAL MEETING ON THE OLD MARLBORO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2012, 7:00 P.M. TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH, PARISH HOUSE 14519 CHURCH STREET, UPPER MARLBORO

Saturday, January 21, 2012

What do We Know about Gambling, Gaming, Casinos & Economic Development in Prince George's County, Maryland?


               It is probably the inadequacy of my search skills that prevents me from finding a detailed report on gaming and gambling in Prince George's County. I am pretty sure that I am one of the very few voters who has not seen such a report and therefore ill-informed on the social and economic impacts and benefits of slots and casinos in Prince George's County and in the Sate of Maryland. I would be interested in reading the 300 years of Maryland laws on gaming and gambling as well as a review of court cased that involved enforcement. I am also looking for metrics and expected development goals and gains besides the now faint to nonexistent support of the horse racing industry.[1]

               The importance of the social effects cannot be understated, though the literature  is growing it remains thin; there is much work to be done to support anecdotal and personal observations as to the negative impacts of gambling on a community. A report from the GAO notes that the "...social effects of gambling on communities are more difficult to measure than the economic effects, primarily because of limited quality data on social effects, the complexity of identifying and measuring social effects, and the difficulty of establishing a cause-effect relationship between gambling and social problems due to the difficulty of isolating any one factor that causes social problems. NGISC made no conclusion on whether or not gambling has increased family problems, crime, or suicide for the general population."[2]

               Because casinos are subject to higher levels of taxation than other enterprises in most locations. the benefit to government revenue streams is well documented. This success means that government itself is a major stakeholder with a big interest in the establishment and will encouraged growth of gaming and gambling as an industry of choice. There is little doubt that gambling benefits government directly. And there seems to be some indication of positive economic development gain. Taxes from casino gambling typically more than pay for government expenditures on roads, police services, and fire protection needed to support the casinos. However the same report points out that social costs were not considered and even recognized and that these costs might be significant.[3]

Laurie Volk, an economic development consultant based in New Jersey, said casinos do little to attract the highly educated younger workers who are considered crucial to urban redevelopment. Those workers prefer more cultural amenities and meeting places such as coffee shops and casual restaurants.[4]                My inability to easily find a detailed Prince George's County Maryland report on the impact and economic development plan that explains the strategy for establishing gaming and gambling in the county raises some concern that we are embarking on another quick fix to some problem scheme. Research indicates that casinos which "...cater to a local market generally do not bring outside money into the economy through the spending of their patrons. In fact, such casinos may have no net ancillary economic impacts. Residents patronizing such casinos may simply substitute gambling for other goods and services. The secondary impacts of spending on the foregone goods and services would therefore be lost, offsetting any ancillary benefits from gaming  expenditures at the casino. However, if a casino attracts gamblers who otherwise would be gambling out-of state, it can have net positive ancillary economic effects."[5]

               It is clear that a new casino catering to a local market can generate positive secondary economic effects that positively impact the high unemployment rate. If there were an equal amount of attention to science,  engineering and venture capital projects, the overall effect of casinos would be a plus at least in the short run. If however our economic development strategy is to create endless entry level service jobs, we probably are not positioning our county to compete in the world markets of tomorrow.  It is very clear that gambling and full casino services would help enhance National Harbor as a major national convention site destination. It is important for the dynamics of National Harbor to provide a wide range of services to attract convention customers. 

               Moreover,  we need to keep in mind that casinos and gambling will have unintended, but predictable, consequences on established small business in the county. The National Gambling Impact Study Commission Report summarized evidence from across the country on the ancillary impacts of casinos on other forms of entertainment. Small business owners from Atlantic City, NJ testified that in 1978, the year that casinos opened, there were 311 taverns and restaurants in the city. Nineteen years later, only 66 remained. The same report discusses the dangers of inter-jurisdictional competition point out that “[i]f every metropolitan area had a Las Vegas style hotel (and perhaps a small casino) … no one would travel far to gamble, and the substitution effect would reach 100%.”[6]  And there are unintended consequences for the gambling industries' major constituency, government, which, in its haste to solve one revenue problem, may exacerbate its financial problems by enabling casinos at the expense of individual discretionary spending on state lotteries.

               If I could find funding, I would provide a complete white paper including literature review, history of the industry and detail of the county and state plan for the economic development potential of gambling and its impact and relation to other economic development strategies. If such a detailed report is already out there I would appreciate any help that would lead me to it so I can sort out the gambling issues before us here in Prince George's County and in Maryland.     


  


[1] Once upon a time we were told that the reason to bring slots was in major part to help support the horse racing industry. I note a very loud silence on this original concept. We seem to be engaged in political mission creep.

[2]  Bernard L. Ungar. United States General Accounting Office. Impact of Gambling. April 2000. [accessed January 21, 2012] http://www.gao.gov/new.items/gg00078.pdf

[3] Bernard L. Ungar. United States General Accounting Office. Impact of Gambling. April 2000. [accessed January 20, 2012] http://www.gao.gov/new.items/gg00078.pdf

[4] John Gallagher. Detroit casino gaming has not led to any noticeable redevelopment downtown. Detroit Free Press. September 30, 2007. [accessed January 21, 2012] http://www.theverifiabletruth.com/2007/09/detroit-casino-gaming-has-not-led-to.html

[5] Heather Brome. This memo summarizes data on state revenues from gaming in New England and provides a review of the literature on the potential secondary impacts of casinos on local economies. Preliminary findings Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. September 14, 2006. [accessed January 21, 2012] http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/neppc/memos/2006/brome091406.pdf

[6] Heather Brome. This memo summarizes data on state revenues from gaming in New England and provides a review of the literature on the potential secondary impacts of casinos on local economies. Preliminary findings Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. September 14, 2006. [accessed January 21, 2012] http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/neppc/memos/2006/brome091406.pdf

:"Nevertheless, a new casino catering to a local market can generate positive secondary economic effects through its employees if it induces an increase in total employment in and around its host community. Such affects are greatest for new casinos in areas of high unemployment (for example, rural Mississippi). Under such conditions, the increased purchasing power of workers who otherwise would be unemployed or “underemployed” generates multiplier effects. However, at the other extreme, a new casino in a tight labor market may cause competition for service sector labor."

Friday, January 20, 2012

Colonial Maryland Slave Laws 33-36: Bacon's Laws of Maryland

33.  Free Mulatto Women, and their Bastard issue, shall be subject to the same Penalties as White Women and their Issue are, for having Mulatto Bastards, by the Act of 1715, ch. 44.  (See above, Art. 3 and 4.) Free Negro Women, having Bastards by White Men, and their Issue, shall be subject to the same Penalties; and the Proceedings hereon shall be the same as prescribed in that Act.  1728, ch. 4.

    34.  Any Negro, or other Slave, convict of Petit-Treason, Murder, or wilfully burning of Dwelling-houses, shall have Judgment to have the Right Hand cut off, to be hanged, quartered, and the Head and Quarters set up in the most public Places of the County.
1729, ch. 4, §. 1.


    35.  Persons stealing any Negro, or other Slave, or who shall counsel, hire, aid, or abet, or command any Person to commit the same, or who shall be accessory to the said Offence; on Conviction, Outlawry, standing Mute, or peremptorily Challenging above Twenty, shall suffer Death without Benefit of Clergy.  1737,
ch. 2, §. 4.



36.  The full Value to be adjudged by the Court, of any condemned Slave, who shall either be actually executed, or die after Condemnation, under Confinement in Order for Execution, shall be paid to the Owner by the Public Treasurer, without any Fee or Reward, out of the Public Stock, on Certificate from the Sheriff of such Execution or Death.  Ibid.  §. 5, 6.



Bacon's Laws of Maryland . Vol 75 page 690 - 691. Maryland Archives  

http://aomol.net/megafile/msa/speccol/sc2900/sc2908/000001/000075/pdf/am75--691.pdf

Thursday, January 19, 2012

In Prince George's County, Maryland's hidden-in-plain-sight, 21st century science research facility


               Where does nutrition information about beef and pork come from?  The answer: Prince George's County, Maryland's hidden-in-plain-sight, 21st century science research facility: the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Nutrient Data Laboratory (NDL) which is part of the research campus at BARC. BARC is shorthand for the Henry A Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, the largest in the world. One would imagine that the county makes this a center piece of economic development, and one would be wrong...at least up to now.

               BARC's NDL lab just released a report of its collaboration with the beef industry and various universities. BARC has conducted several research studies designed to update or expand the nutrient data on beef and pork cuts in the USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference (SR).[1] 

               According to USDA's website, "These studies have not only provided current and accurate estimates of beef [and pork] data to update SR, but the study results are now being incorporated into a data set that can be used for nutrient labeling.  NDL has developed a reference called the USDA Nutrient Data Set for Retail Beef Cuts, Release 2.0 which presents beef data in an easily usable table format.[2]   

               The question I have for Prince George's County and Maryland is why we are not actively working in partnership to take advantage of USDA's technology transfer programs as a tool for economic development? Can't we think of something else besides retail malls? How about a state and county incubator directed at bio-agro-tech solutions that takes advantage of the leasing authority for research that BARC and NAL have?[3]

               The State of Maryland has as one of its key focus for economic  development a commitment to "work with area research institutions,  universities/colleges and the private sector to develop a strategy for connecting researchers with federal and State resources and funding opportunities to aid new business development."[4] USDA-ARS BARC through its Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) program is the primary tool linking government and industry researchers. This program has sat here unsupported by any Prince George's County initiative since 1986. The program, authorized under the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986, allows federal laboratories and businesses to form partnerships that help move new technologies to the marketplace.

               What exactly are we here in Prince George's County waiting for?




[1] Rosalie Marion Bliss. Nutrient Data in Time for the New Year. January 13, 2012. [accessed January 19, 2012] http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/pr/2012/120113.htm

[2][2] USDA Nutrient Data Set for Retail Beef Cuts, Release 2.0. [accessed January 19, 2012] http://www.ars.usda.gov/Services/docs.htm?docid=18961

"This data set provides retailers with easier access to the most accurate beef nutrient data for the purpose of on-pack nutrition labeling and for nutrition claims. This data set focuses on the beef cuts identified by USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) proposed labeling regulations for fresh, single-ingredient meats in addition to some new Beef Value Cuts. The FSIS, an agency of the USDA, is the public health agency responsible for ensuring that the nation's commercial supply of meat, poultry and egg products is safe, wholesome, and correctly labeled and packaged."

[3] USDA-ARS-BARC Seeks Expressions of Interest to Lease  This procurement is for an Enhanced Use Lease (EUL) opportunity for 5 separate parcels located within the Beltsville Agriculture Research Campus in Beltsville, Maryland. USDA's objective for this RFP is to receive proposals from a prospective Offeror from qualified private or public entities interested in leading the development and long-term operation of facilities to promote the mission of ARS and the research programs at BARC. Offerors are expected to have either a collaborative agreement in place or a plan of a potential project with current research program at BARC. Before a lease can be signed a collaborator research agreement must in place. https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=fb6753a961bfc08baacf8f2cb4377708&tab=core&_cview=0 

[4] Federal Facilities Advisory Board. Interim Report To The Governor And Legislature. February 2011. [accessed January 19, 2012]  http://www.choosemaryland.org/aboutdbed/Documents/ProgramReports/Final_FFAB%20Interim_Report_3-22-11.pdf

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Prince George's County Libraries, SOPA and PIPA - it's about information and power


               Access to information is the path to life with quality, to health, to wealth, to bare necessities and ultimately to power. Prince George's County libraries are on the forefront of the battle to provide access to information to all people regardless of the size of their bank accounts. Libraries today are in trouble, even national libraries such as the National Agricultural Library here in Prince George's County; and the Prince George's County Memorial Library System is no different. Funding is flat or declining  and access to media is shrinking. Some publishers have decided not to sell electronic books to libraries further diminishing access to information. The greed of the few outweighs the need  of the many.[1]

               The powerful few say that we do not need books anymore, and then try to restrict on-line access through proposed national laws that benefit the few today leaving the many to fend for themselves  outside the information highway tomorrow.  So on top of not having money to by library materials, and publishers unwilling to sell to libraries even if there were funds we now have SOPA and PIPA;  "two bills in the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate respectively. SOPA is short for the "Stop Online Piracy Act," and PIPA is an acronym for the "Protect IP Act." ("IP" stands for "intellectual property.") In short, these bills are efforts to stop copyright infringement committed by foreign web sites, but, in our opinion, they do so in a way that actually infringes free expression while harming the Internet. Detailed information about these bills can be found in the Stop Online Piracy Act and PROTECT IP Act articles on Wikipedia, which are available during the blackout. GovTrack lets you follow both bills through the legislative process: SOPA on this page, and PIPA on this one. The EFF has summarized why these bills are simply unacceptable in a world that values an open, secure, and free Internet."[2]  

               Make no mistake, it is not in the interest of wealth to provide free access to information. Business are set up to make a profit not give away the store. Only large groups of people working together can ameliorate the drive to exclusion by regulating through the instrument of the people known as government. You cannot boycott information as you might boycott tennis shoes. But the sword of government has to edges and today we are seeing special profit interests try to restrict the flow and access of information to the benefit of a few now at the exspense of the good of the many later.


[1] Christian Davenport. As demand for e-books soars, libraries struggle to stock their virtual shelves. January 14, 2012. [accessed January 18, 2012]

"...among librarians trying to stock their virtual shelves and working with limited budgets and little cooperation from some publishers; and among publishers who are fearful of piracy and wading into a digital future that could further destabilize their industry. In many cases, the publishers are limiting the number of e-books made available to libraries."

[2] Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. [accessed January 18, 2012] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative/Learn_more